Topic summary
⁠39%1 analyzed article/video842 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Financial Responsibility results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Confirmation Bias, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 313 hits. Analysis detected 1,941 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠28% (16,394 of 22,754 topics). This Financial Responsibility is better (less manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Financial Responsibility
Topic details
Total words: 3,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

28% percentile
025507510028.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.3%0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 6.2%6.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.7%0.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Indoctrination: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Middle Ground: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos