Topic summary
42% 9 analyzed articles/videos 7,737 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Federal-State Relations results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Confirmation Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 2,292 hits . Analysis detected 18,483 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,668 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 8% (22,554 of 24,411 topics). This Federal-State Relations is better (less manipulative) than 92.40% of the peer group. Federal-State Relations
Topic details
Total words: 33,668
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.6% percentile 1.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles33.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.8% 6.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.0% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst