Topic summary
61% 7 analyzed articles/videos 1,920 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fatal Accidents results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Biased Writer Voice , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 1,786 hits . Analysis detected 11,505 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,824 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 35% (16,010 of 24,467 topics). This Fatal Accidents is better (less manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group. Fatal Accidents
Topic details
Total words: 13,824
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score7 analyzed articles13.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.7% 9.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Red Herring: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst