Topic summary
⁠98%1 analyzed article/video611 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fairness In Sports results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.7% saturation with 481 hits. Analysis detected 3,426 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,444 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠81% (4,336 of 22,214 topics). This Fairness In Sports is worse (more manipulative) than 80.50% of the peer group.
Fairness In Sports
Topic details
Total words: 2,444
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

81% percentile
025507510080.5% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.7%19.7%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 15.5%15.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.5%14.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 14.2%14.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.7%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 15.5%, sitewide 1.4%Hasty Generalization: Topic 14.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Nature: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Straw Man: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos