Topic summary
⁠28%2 analyzed articles/videos1,186 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Violations results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 280 hits. Analysis detected 2,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,744 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠38% (15,406 of 24,566 topics). This Environmental Violations is better (less manipulative) than 62.70% of the peer group.
Environmental Violations
Topic details
Total words: 4,744
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510037.3% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Primacy Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.9%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos