Author summary
37%2 analyzed articles/videos1,912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norberto Santana Jr. results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 530 hits. Analysis detected 4,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,594 of 8,525 authors). This Norberto Santana Jr. is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group.
Norberto Santana Jr.
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
35%Norberto Santana Jr. (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 7,648
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

34% percentile
025507510034.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 6.9%6.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.4%3.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.7%0.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7%Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate