Author summary
37% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,912 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Norberto Santana Jr. results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Confirmation Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.9% saturation with 530 hits . Analysis detected 4,314 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,648 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 35% (5,594 of 8,525 authors). This Norberto Santana Jr. is better (less manipulative) than 65.60% of the peer group. Norberto Santana Jr.
Author details
Total words: 7,648
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
34% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 34.4% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.9% 6.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.4% 2.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.6%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Author 1.4%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst