Topic summary
24% 11 analyzed articles/videos 12,125 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Remediation results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Confirmation Bias , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.6% saturation with 3,502 hits . Analysis detected 19,977 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,026 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (23,672 of 24,062 topics). This Environmental Remediation is better (less manipulative) than 98.40% of the peer group. Environmental Remediation
Topic details
Total words: 53,026
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.6% percentile 0.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles53K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.0% 0.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst