Publication summary
45% 14 analyzed articles/videos 14,453 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Investigative Post results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 6,782 hits . Analysis detected 31,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 61,650 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of 21% (436 of 548 publications). This Investigative Post is better (less manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 61,650
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 20.5% percentile 1.0% BS Score14 analyzed articles61.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 3.7% 3.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 11.0% 11.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 0.1% 0.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.9% 2.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.9% 0.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 3.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst