Topic summary
56% 21 analyzed articles/videos 11,594 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Law results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 5,379 hits . Analysis detected 47,266 faulty-reasoning hits from 62,048 analyzed words across 21 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 16% (18,466 of 21,790 topics). This Environmental Law is better (less manipulative) than 84.70% of the peer group. Environmental Law
Topic details
Total words: 62,048
Article count: 21
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 15.3% percentile 1.4% BS Score21 analyzed articles62K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.4% 7.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst