Topic summary
⁠8%1 analyzed article/video1,923 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Environmental Art results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Indoctrination, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 3.9% saturation with 303 hits. Analysis detected 1,794 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,692 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠6% (22,598 of 23,944 topics). This Environmental Art is better (less manipulative) than 94.40% of the peer group.
Environmental Art
Topic details
Total words: 7,692
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.6% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.0%1.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos