Topic summary
77% 11 analyzed articles/videos 9,580 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Energy Consumption results contain 50 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 3,552 hits . Analysis detected 36,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 40,882 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (17,066 of 24,545 topics). This Energy Consumption is better (less manipulative) than 69.50% of the peer group. Energy Consumption
Topic details
Total words: 40,882
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
31% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 30.5% percentile 1.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles40.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.3% 3.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.5% 4.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 8.7% 8.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 3.3% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst