Topic summary
⁠99%2 analyzed articles/videos638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Employee Bonuses results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Halo Effect, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 34.5% saturation with 723 hits. Analysis detected 4,458 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,094 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 7.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,928 of 22,395 topics). This Employee Bonuses is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group.
Employee Bonuses
Topic details
Total words: 2,094
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

91% percentile
025507510091.4% percentile
7.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 24.1%24.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 32.1%32.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.2%6.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 10.0%10.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 34.5%34.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.5%1.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 8.6%8.6%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.7%9.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 34.5%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 32.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 24.1%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.7%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.4%In-Group Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos