Topic summary
⁠70%2 analyzed articles/videos1,686 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Elon Musk's Ventures results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19.9% saturation with 1,340 hits. Analysis detected 6,875 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,744 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,091 of 22,269 topics). This Elon Musk's Ventures is worse (more manipulative) than 54.70% of the peer group.
Elon Musk's Ventures
Topic details
Total words: 6,744
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.7% percentile
2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.3%6.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.5%8.5%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos