Topic summary
79% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,168 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Electoral Integrity results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.8% saturation with 1,715 hits . Analysis detected 9,876 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,672 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 61% (9,720 of 24,545 topics). This Electoral Integrity is worse (more manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group. Electoral Integrity
Topic details
Total words: 8,672
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
60% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.4% percentile 2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.4% 5.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.8% 19.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.8%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 7.5% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst