Topic summary
17%1 analyzed article/video5,149 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Election Laws And Regulations results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 7.3% saturation with 1,502 hits. Analysis detected 8,583 faulty-reasoning hits from 20,596 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.1% and a BS Rank of 6% (22,659 of 24,058 topics). This Election Laws And Regulations is better (less manipulative) than 94.20% of the peer group.
Election Laws And Regulations
Topic details
Total words: 20,596
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

6% percentile
02550751005.8% percentile
1.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles20.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.0%0.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos