Topic summary
71% 14 analyzed articles/videos 8,324 analyzed words
BS Summary: These El Nino results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Pessimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 4,611 hits . Analysis detected 34,216 faulty-reasoning hits from 45,022 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 25% (17,075 of 22,501 topics). This El Nino is better (less manipulative) than 75.90% of the peer group. El Nino
Topic details
Total words: 45,022
Article count: 14
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 24.1% percentile 1.7% BS Score14 analyzed articles45K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.7% 4.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.2% 10.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.2% 4.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 1.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Bandwagon: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst