Author summary
30% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,646 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michaela Mulligan results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error , Availability Heuristic , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 594 hits . Analysis detected 3,419 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,584 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,956 of 9,206 authors). This Michaela Mulligan is better (less manipulative) than 64.70% of the peer group. Michaela Mulligan
Author details
Total words: 6,584
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
35% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.3% percentile 1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.8% 2.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 2.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.3%, sitewide 3.3% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.1% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Actor-Observer Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 1.5%, sitewide 0.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst