Topic summary
45%2 analyzed articles/videos1,640 analyzed words
BS Summary: These E Scooters results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 811 hits. Analysis detected 4,550 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,560 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 31% (17,021 of 24,545 topics). This E Scooters is better (less manipulative) than 69.30% of the peer group.
E Scooters
Topic details
Total words: 6,560
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

31% percentile
025507510030.7% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.3%3.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.1%9.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.4%12.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos