Topic summary
⁠75%2 analyzed articles/videos1,391 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dermatology results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 9.8% saturation with 545 hits. Analysis detected 5,574 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,564 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (8,626 of 23,346 topics). This Dermatology is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Dermatology
Topic details
Total words: 5,564
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.9%3.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.1%5.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.1%1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.8%9.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.9%3.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.7%4.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.5%5.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 0.5%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.7%, sitewide 0.8%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Bandwagon: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos