Author summary
99% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,047 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Susan Quinn results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 2,091 hits . Analysis detected 14,988 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,188 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 83% (1,582 of 9,277 authors). This Susan Quinn is worse (more manipulative) than 83.00% of the peer group. Susan Quinn
Author details
Total words: 8,188
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.0% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 21.8% 21.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 25.5% 25.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 9.7% 9.7% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 10.6% 10.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.2% 11.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.5% 0.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.8% 3.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 10.9% 10.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 9.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 25.5%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 21.8%, sitewide 1.4% Negativity Bias: Author 11.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 10.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 11.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.8%, sitewide 11.1% Straw Man: Author 10.6%, sitewide 0.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Author 7.6%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Slippery Slope: Author 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst