Topic summary
84% 12 analyzed articles/videos 6,617 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Department Of Homeland Security results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 3,096 hits . Analysis detected 26,688 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,835 analyzed words across 12 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (16,293 of 22,542 topics). This Department Of Homeland Security is better (less manipulative) than 72.30% of the peer group. Department Of Homeland Security
Topic details
Total words: 28,835
Article count: 12
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.7% percentile 1.7% BS Score12 analyzed articles28.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.7% 10.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.3% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst