Topic summary
⁠96%1 analyzed article/video915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Denver Homes results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 35.6% saturation with 1,303 hits. Analysis detected 3,803 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠77% (5,252 of 22,651 topics). This Denver Homes is worse (more manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group.
Denver Homes
Topic details
Total words: 3,660
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

77% percentile
025507510076.8% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 26.5%26.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 35.6%35.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 35.6%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 26.5%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%False Dilemma: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Horn Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.0%Composition/Division: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 0.5%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.3%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos