Author summary
84% 2 analyzed articles/videos 915 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hannah Metzger results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.4% saturation with 1,478 hits . Analysis detected 4,116 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,866 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 72% (2,425 of 8,520 authors). This Hannah Metzger is worse (more manipulative) than 71.50% of the peer group. Hannah Metzger
Author details
Total words: 4,866
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
72% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 71.5% percentile 3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 19.9% 19.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 30.4% 30.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.4% 1.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Author 30.4%, sitewide 19.2% Framing Effect: Author 2.1%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 19.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.5% Horn Effect: Author 1.1%, sitewide 1.0% Composition/Division: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.2% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst