Topic summary
⁠39%2 analyzed articles/videos619 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Innovation results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Circular Reasoning, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 504 hits. Analysis detected 1,735 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,570 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (14,426 of 23,424 topics). This Defense Innovation is better (less manipulative) than 61.60% of the peer group.
Defense Innovation
Topic details
Total words: 3,570
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

38% percentile
025507510038.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 3.9%3.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 14.1%14.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos