Author summary
54%4 analyzed articles/videos2,810 analyzed words
BS Summary: These dlawrence results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Overconfidence Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,286 hits. Analysis detected 7,653 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,240 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 36% (5,592 of 8,732 authors). This dlawrence is better (less manipulative) than 64.00% of the peer group.
dlawrence
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
36%dlawrence (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 11,240
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

36% percentile
025507510036.0% percentile
1.8% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 3.7%3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Author 11.4%11.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 6.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 11.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Author 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.2%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Author 7.4%, sitewide 6.0%Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate