Topic summary
⁠84%3 analyzed articles/videos2,858 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Dating Advice results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 22.1% saturation with 2,417 hits. Analysis detected 11,929 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,938 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (11,746 of 24,597 topics). This Dating Advice is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Dating Advice
Topic details
Total words: 10,938
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

52% percentile
025507510052.2% percentile
2.5% BS Score3 analyzed articles10.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 22.1%22.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.4%8.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.3%12.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Topic 5.4%5.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 22.1%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.9%Anecdotal: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos