Topic summary
⁠73%4 analyzed articles/videos4,348 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Data Protection results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Hasty Generalization, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 1,779 hits. Analysis detected 12,954 faulty-reasoning hits from 17,392 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠43% (14,048 of 24,572 topics). This Data Protection is better (less manipulative) than 57.20% of the peer group.
Data Protection
Topic details
Total words: 17,392
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.8% percentile
2.1% BS Score4 analyzed articles17.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.2%10.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.2%1.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.0%1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Indoctrination: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos