Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Corruption Scandals results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Ad Hominem, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.9% saturation with 789 hits. Analysis detected 4,020 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,665 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 22,420 topics). This Corruption Scandals is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Corruption Scandals
Topic details
Total words: 4,665
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.4%0.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 16.9%16.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 15.1%15.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.9%2.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 6.3%6.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 16.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 15.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Ad Hominem: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Horn Effect: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Personal Incredulity: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2%Tu Quoque: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos