Topic summary
⁠61%4 analyzed articles/videos2,908 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Consumer Finance results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Pessimism Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 874 hits. Analysis detected 7,196 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,632 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (17,919 of 24,373 topics). This Consumer Finance is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Consumer Finance
Topic details
Total words: 11,632
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

27% percentile
025507510026.5% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.0%2.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.1%0.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.7%1.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 5.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos