Topic summary
⁠66%5 analyzed articles/videos3,212 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Conservation Policy results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.3% saturation with 2,214 hits. Analysis detected 13,762 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,524 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (15,361 of 22,919 topics). This Conservation Policy is better (less manipulative) than 67.00% of the peer group.
Conservation Policy

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510033.0% percentile
1.9% BS Score5 analyzed articles15.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.8%5.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.3%14.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.5%2.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.4%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos