Topic summary
58% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,012 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Community College Funding results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias , Optimism Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 11.6% saturation with 881 hits . Analysis detected 3,761 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,606 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 24% (18,766 of 24,545 topics). This Community College Funding is better (less manipulative) than 76.50% of the peer group. Community College Funding
Topic details
Total words: 7,606
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
24% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.5% percentile 1.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.2% 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 11.6% 11.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 11.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst