Author summary
12%3 analyzed articles/videos3,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Katie Klingsporn results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 5.6% saturation with 673 hits. Analysis detected 3,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 12,100 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 0.9% and a BS Rank of 4% (8,378 of 8,685 authors). This Katie Klingsporn is better (less manipulative) than 96.50% of the peer group.
Katie Klingsporn
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Hannah Martin1%
0%Paul DeMark1%
0%Emma Sedlak1%
0%Michael Fox1%
0%San Antonio Report Staff1%
4%Katie Klingsporn (selected)1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 12,100
Article count: 3
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

4% percentile
02550751003.5% percentile
0.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles12.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 0.7%0.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 1.1%1.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.2%0.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 0.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 0.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate