Topic summary
⁠68%2 analyzed articles/videos695 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Clean Air Act results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 400 hits. Analysis detected 3,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,780 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,356 of 22,221 topics). This Clean Air Act is worse (more manipulative) than 71.40% of the peer group.
Clean Air Act
Topic details
Total words: 2,780
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510071.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.4%14.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.7%7.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 8.5%8.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.0%2.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.7%10.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.9%11.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 2.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos