Topic summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video1,721 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Civilian Impact Of War results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Pessimism Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 21% saturation with 1,447 hits. Analysis detected 5,281 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,884 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠53% (10,899 of 22,983 topics). This Civilian Impact Of War is worse (more manipulative) than 52.60% of the peer group.
Civilian Impact Of War
Topic details
Total words: 6,884
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

53% percentile
025507510052.6% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.8%2.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.4%10.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 21.0%21.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.6%6.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.3%3.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 21.0%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 1.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos