Topic summary
⁠32%1 analyzed article/video387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Chips Act results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Anchoring Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 257 hits. Analysis detected 933 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠75% (6,327 of 24,458 topics). This Chips Act is worse (more manipulative) than 74.10% of the peer group.
Chips Act
Topic details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

74% percentile
025507510074.1% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.2%3.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.6%16.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.9%3.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 12.1%12.1%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 26.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.6%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 9.1%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.3%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos