Topic summary
⁠90%2 analyzed articles/videos1,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These China Iran Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19.2% saturation with 881 hits. Analysis detected 6,042 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,600 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (7,137 of 23,998 topics). This China Iran Relations is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
China Iran Relations
Topic details
Total words: 4,600
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.0%11.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 19.1%19.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.8%3.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.7%4.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.3%3.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 5.2%5.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 3.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.4%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos