Topic summary
93%8 analyzed articles/videos5,925 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Child Care results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 3,332 hits. Analysis detected 28,118 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,688 analyzed words across 8 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 43% (14,008 of 24,543 topics). This Child Care is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

43% percentile
025507510042.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score8 analyzed articles26.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.7%9.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.5%12.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.4%4.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate