Topic summary
⁠20%3 analyzed articles/videos4,522 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Campaign Fundraising results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 5.2% saturation with 946 hits. Analysis detected 6,813 faulty-reasoning hits from 18,088 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (21,910 of 22,932 topics). This Campaign Fundraising is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Campaign Fundraising

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
1.0% BS Score3 analyzed articles18.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.0%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos