Topic summary
84% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,516 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Caitlin Clark results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 4,089 hits . Analysis detected 24,094 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,658 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 48% (12,068 of 23,210 topics). This Caitlin Clark is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group. Caitlin Clark
Topic details
Total words: 21,658
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
48% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.0% percentile 2.4% BS Score10 analyzed articles21.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.9% 18.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 5.5% 5.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.1% 0.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst