Topic summary
⁠5%2 analyzed articles/videos223 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brooklyn Bridge results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.3% saturation with 47 hits. Analysis detected 174 faulty-reasoning hits from 892 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (10,074 of 24,545 topics). This Brooklyn Bridge is worse (more manipulative) than 59.00% of the peer group.
Brooklyn Bridge
Topic details
Total words: 892
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.0% percentile
2.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles892 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.3%5.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos