Topic summary
86% 7 analyzed articles/videos 6,975 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brazil results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 2,749 hits . Analysis detected 22,366 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,874 analyzed words across 7 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 28% (17,771 of 24,545 topics). This Brazil is better (less manipulative) than 72.40% of the peer group. Brazil
Topic details
Total words: 26,874
Article count: 7
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
28% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 27.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score7 analyzed articles26.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.2% 10.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 9.5% 9.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.0% Begging the Question: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst