Topic summary
52% 3 analyzed articles/videos 4,037 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Brain results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Appeal to Authority , and Optimism Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,506 hits . Analysis detected 9,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,191 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 27% (16,949 of 23,011 topics). This Brain is better (less manipulative) than 73.70% of the peer group. Brain
Topic details
Total words: 14,191
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
26% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.3% percentile 1.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles14.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.2% 2.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 0.2% 0.2% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 9.9% 9.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 5.6% 5.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.7% 1.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 8.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.9%, sitewide 3.3% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst