Topic summary
⁠30%1 analyzed article/video459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Body Storage Violations results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Appeal to Emotion, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.6% saturation with 231 hits. Analysis detected 1,223 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,836 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠59% (10,167 of 24,545 topics). This Body Storage Violations is worse (more manipulative) than 58.60% of the peer group.
Body Storage Violations
Topic details
Total words: 1,836
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.6% percentile
2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.2%7.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.6%12.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.2%1.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Red Herring: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.7%Personal Incredulity: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.4%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos