Author summary
12% 1 analyzed article/video 1,205 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad Samra results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Unattributed Quote , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6.1% saturation with 296 hits . Analysis detected 1,859 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 19% (7,549 of 9,307 authors). This Mohammad Samra is better (less manipulative) than 81.10% of the peer group. Mohammad Samra
Author details
Total words: 4,820
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
19% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 18.9% percentile 1.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 0.3% 0.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 0.3% 0.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.8% 2.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.4% 1.4% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 0.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 6.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 0.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.1%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.4% Indoctrination: Author 0.9%, sitewide 0.0% Primacy Effect: Author 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst