Topic summary
86%2 analyzed articles/videos1,574 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Black Sea results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 878 hits. Analysis detected 6,564 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,296 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 66% (8,233 of 24,112 topics). This Black Sea is worse (more manipulative) than 65.90% of the peer group.
Black Sea
Topic details
Total words: 6,296
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

66% percentile
025507510065.9% percentile
3.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos