Topic summary
⁠89%3 analyzed articles/videos2,835 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anti Israel Sentiment results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 28% saturation with 2,699 hits. Analysis detected 13,310 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,642 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (5,784 of 23,721 topics). This Anti Israel Sentiment is worse (more manipulative) than 75.60% of the peer group.
Anti Israel Sentiment
Topic details
Total words: 9,642
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.6% percentile
3.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 28.0%28.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Topic 9.2%9.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.4%0.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 28.0%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 8.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 1.4%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Indoctrination: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 3.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Horn Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos