Topic summary
⁠82%1 analyzed article/video587 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Alternative Funding results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 14.7% saturation with 345 hits. Analysis detected 2,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,348 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠72% (6,916 of 24,545 topics). This Alternative Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 71.80% of the peer group.
Alternative Funding
Topic details
Total words: 2,348
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510071.8% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.8%13.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 14.7%14.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.9%13.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.3%2.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 14.7%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Red Herring: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos