Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Alchemy results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Blind-Spot Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 2.4% saturation with 125 hits. Analysis detected 391 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,106 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 24,545 topics). This Alchemy is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Alchemy
Topic details
Total words: 5,106
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.3%0.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.5%2.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Blind-Spot BiasSitewide 0.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos