Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video614 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Airport Renaming results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.9% saturation with 342 hits. Analysis detected 1,841 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,456 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠64% (9,065 of 24,545 topics). This Airport Renaming is worse (more manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Airport Renaming
Topic details
Total words: 2,456
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.1% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.0%10.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.9%13.9%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 7.3%7.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.3%1.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos