Topic summary
⁠78%2 analyzed articles/videos1,288 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Air Warfare results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 12.4% saturation with 638 hits. Analysis detected 5,860 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,152 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠63% (9,086 of 24,545 topics). This Air Warfare is worse (more manipulative) than 63.00% of the peer group.
Air Warfare
Topic details
Total words: 5,152
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

63% percentile
025507510063.0% percentile
3.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 12.4%12.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.0%8.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 8.3%8.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 12.4%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 4.6%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos